Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,130 bytes added ,  11 years ago
Line 16: Line 16:     
See ICANN's [http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/tas/batching-basics%20 '''Batching Basics here'''].
 
See ICANN's [http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/tas/batching-basics%20 '''Batching Basics here'''].
 +
 +
==Reactions Against Digital Archery (Batching System)==
 +
Several companies companies including [[ARI Registry Services]], [[Melbourne IT]] and [[Group NBT]] expressed opposition on the implementation of the digital archery and the entire batching system of [[ICANN]]. The companies believed that the mechanism is not the best solution to ensure the fairness and efficiency of the initial evaluation process for gTLD applications. [[Adrian Kinderis]], CEO of ARI Registry Services suggested that instead of implementing the batching system, it is better if all gTLD applications will go through the initial evaluation process in a single batch within 10-12 months instead of the proposed 5-6 months initial evaluation period for every batch. According to him, the idea to extend the evaluation period to 12 months is supported by some of the big registry operators. He said, ''"We’ve talked to some of the big registries and they’re waiting for us to put this out so they can come to the party and support it."'' <ref>[http://domainincite.com/9239-revolt-brewing-over-digital-archery Revolt brewing over digital archery]</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
9,082

edits

Navigation menu