Changes

The discussion mainly focused on:

The discussion mainly focused on:

* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>

* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>

::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."  

::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard, Full Consensus, to the next level, General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."  

* Whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>

* Whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>

::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”

::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”