| Public comment on the draft report was minimal.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/board-review-2009/ ICANN.org Listserv Archive - Draft Final Report of the Board Review Working Group</ref> The working group submitted its final report to the board in January 2010.<ref name="dashboard" /><ref name="wgfinal">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/board-review-final-26jan10-en.pdf Final Report of the Board Review Working Group], January 26, 2010</ref> In nearly every recommendation category, the working group notes that either the board, a committee of the board, or both, are "already working" on the recommendations of BCG's final report, or something like them, in response to the issues raised by the report. As a result, the final report of the working group contains a great deal of support for the recommendations contained in BCG's final report, but very little implementation guidance.<ref name="wgfinal" /> | | Public comment on the draft report was minimal.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/board-review-2009/ ICANN.org Listserv Archive - Draft Final Report of the Board Review Working Group</ref> The working group submitted its final report to the board in January 2010.<ref name="dashboard" /><ref name="wgfinal">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/board-review-final-26jan10-en.pdf Final Report of the Board Review Working Group], January 26, 2010</ref> In nearly every recommendation category, the working group notes that either the board, a committee of the board, or both, are "already working" on the recommendations of BCG's final report, or something like them, in response to the issues raised by the report. As a result, the final report of the working group contains a great deal of support for the recommendations contained in BCG's final report, but very little implementation guidance.<ref name="wgfinal" /> |
− | The Board accepted the final report in March 2010, along with two other Article 4.4 organizational reviews ([[First SSAC Organizational Review|SSAC1]] and [[First NomCom Organizational Review|NomCom1), and instructed the [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee|SIC]] to develop implementation plans for each.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-03-12-en#1.6 Resolution of the Board], March 12, 2010</ref> In June 2010, the board again addressed the three reviews from the March meeting, and instructed the SIC to present "final implementation plans" for each.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-06-25-en#1.4 Resolution of the Board], June 25, 2010</ref> | + | The Board accepted the final report in March 2010, along with two other Article 4.4 organizational reviews ([[First SSAC Organizational Review|SSAC1]] and [[First NomCom Organizational Review|NomCom1]]), and instructed the [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee|SIC]] to develop implementation plans for each.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-03-12-en#1.6 Resolution of the Board], March 12, 2010</ref> In June 2010, the board again addressed the three reviews from the March meeting, and instructed the SIC to present "final implementation plans" for each.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-06-25-en#1.4 Resolution of the Board], June 25, 2010</ref> |
| ICANN's Board Review dashboard indicates that the June 2010 board resolution was the end of the implementation phase for the first and only Board Review.<ref name="dashboard" /> Implementation details are unavailable, likely because the working group's final report did not recommend any specific implementation plans. | | ICANN's Board Review dashboard indicates that the June 2010 board resolution was the end of the implementation phase for the first and only Board Review.<ref name="dashboard" /> Implementation details are unavailable, likely because the working group's final report did not recommend any specific implementation plans. |