Difference between revisions of "Third Accountability and Transparency Review"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
 +
===Purpose and Origin of Specific Reviews===
 
The [[Affirmation of Commitments]], an agreement between ICANN and the [[United States Department of Commerce]], establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:
 
The [[Affirmation of Commitments]], an agreement between ICANN and the [[United States Department of Commerce]], establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:
 
*ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
 
*ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
Line 14: Line 15:
 
The [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en ICANN.org - Organizational Effectiveness Committee]</ref> The ATRT is one such specific review.
 
The [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en ICANN.org - Organizational Effectiveness Committee]</ref> The ATRT is one such specific review.
  
==Process and Findings==
 
 
===Delays in Launching Substantive Work===
 
===Delays in Launching Substantive Work===
 
The call for volunteers for ATRT3 was initially put out in January, 2017. It was subsequently extended in April 2017. At the time of extension, the Board noted that multiple factors were impacting the timing of ATRT3. Because of the timing of [[Second Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT2]], the ICANN Bylaws required that the review be launched not later than October 2017. Meanwhile, the Cross Community Working Group on ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) notified that Board in 2016 that its work was overlapping substantially with the scope of ATRT reviews. The CCWG-Accountability co-chairs raised the possibility of crafting a narrow scope for ATRT3, to avoid duplication of work.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/call-for-volunteers-for-the-third-review-of-icann-accountability-and-transparency-atrt3-31-1-2017-en ICANN.org - Call for Volunteers for ATRT3], January 1, 2017</ref> At the same time, the [[IANA Transition]] was just wrapping up, and many voices within the ICANN community were speaking up about volunteer fatigue.<ref name="launchres">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2018-10-25-en#2.a Resolution of the Board], October 25, 2018</ref> As a result, in 2018 the Board submitted three separate papers for public comment: "Short-Term options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews,"<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews], May 14, 2018</ref> "Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews,"<ref>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-long-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Long Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews], May 14, 2018</ref> and a follow-up "Next Steps on Reviews" document.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-next-steps-2018-09-05-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Next Steps on Reviews]</ref>
 
The call for volunteers for ATRT3 was initially put out in January, 2017. It was subsequently extended in April 2017. At the time of extension, the Board noted that multiple factors were impacting the timing of ATRT3. Because of the timing of [[Second Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT2]], the ICANN Bylaws required that the review be launched not later than October 2017. Meanwhile, the Cross Community Working Group on ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) notified that Board in 2016 that its work was overlapping substantially with the scope of ATRT reviews. The CCWG-Accountability co-chairs raised the possibility of crafting a narrow scope for ATRT3, to avoid duplication of work.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/call-for-volunteers-for-the-third-review-of-icann-accountability-and-transparency-atrt3-31-1-2017-en ICANN.org - Call for Volunteers for ATRT3], January 1, 2017</ref> At the same time, the [[IANA Transition]] was just wrapping up, and many voices within the ICANN community were speaking up about volunteer fatigue.<ref name="launchres">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2018-10-25-en#2.a Resolution of the Board], October 25, 2018</ref> As a result, in 2018 the Board submitted three separate papers for public comment: "Short-Term options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews,"<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews], May 14, 2018</ref> "Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews,"<ref>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-long-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Long Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews], May 14, 2018</ref> and a follow-up "Next Steps on Reviews" document.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-next-steps-2018-09-05-en ICANN Public Comment Archive - Next Steps on Reviews]</ref>
Line 20: Line 20:
 
In October 2018, the board approved a resolution to instruct ATRT3 to begin work, encouraging them to promptly submit their work plan and begin substantive work in January 2019. It also appointed [[Maarten Botterman]] to the ATRT3 team.<ref name="launchres" />
 
In October 2018, the board approved a resolution to instruct ATRT3 to begin work, encouraging them to promptly submit their work plan and begin substantive work in January 2019. It also appointed [[Maarten Botterman]] to the ATRT3 team.<ref name="launchres" />
  
===Findings and Recommendations===
+
==Review Team==
 
The ATRT3 review team held its first in-person meeting in April 2019 to set the scope of the review and establish its work plan.<ref name="workplan">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/kane-langdon-orr-to-icann-board-14jun19-en.pdf ATRT3 Terms of Reference and Work Plan], June 14, 2018.</ref> Unlike previous ATRT reviews, the review team did not identify a need for an independent expert to consult. Instead, they identified four top-level issues for the review team's work parties to address:
 
The ATRT3 review team held its first in-person meeting in April 2019 to set the scope of the review and establish its work plan.<ref name="workplan">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/kane-langdon-orr-to-icann-board-14jun19-en.pdf ATRT3 Terms of Reference and Work Plan], June 14, 2018.</ref> Unlike previous ATRT reviews, the review team did not identify a need for an independent expert to consult. Instead, they identified four top-level issues for the review team's work parties to address:
 
# Board governance and community interaction;
 
# Board governance and community interaction;
 
# GAC interaction with the board and the broader community;
 
# GAC interaction with the board and the broader community;
 
# Review processes - how ICANN receives public input, as well as a review of implementation of recommendations from [[Second Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT2]];
 
# Review processes - how ICANN receives public input, as well as a review of implementation of recommendations from [[Second Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT2]];
# The impact of ICANN's decision-making process as it relates to the broader Internet community, and the effectiveness of ICANN's policy development process in fostering cross community particiipation.<ref name="workplan" />
+
# The impact of ICANN's decision-making process as it relates to the broader Internet community, and the effectiveness of ICANN's policy development process in fostering cross community participation.<ref name="workplan" />
  
The four work parties presented findings that were consolidated into a draft report and recommendations, published for public comment on December 14, 2019.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-report-atrt3-summary-16dec19-en.pdf ATRT3 - Draft Report for Public Comment], December 16, 2019.</ref> The draft report received comments from many ICANN bodies, as well as the board.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-atrt3-draft-report-14feb20-en.pdf Staff Report on Public Comment Proceeding], February 14, 2020</ref> The review team analyzed and incorporated the comments into the final version of its report, which was delivered to the board in May 2020.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf ATRT3 - Final Report], May 29, 2020</ref>  
+
===Methodology===
 +
The ATRT3 team utilized a number of fact-finding methods in order to gain a picture of the current state of ICANN's accountability and transparency initiatives:
 +
* Review and assessment of ATRT2 implementation;
 +
* Within each topic area, the work parties devised questions for a survey that was issued to the ICANN community, with specific invitations to ICANN structures ([[Advisory Committee|ACs]], [[Supporting Organizations|SOs]], [[GNSO Houses|GNSO constituencies]], and [[Regional At-Large Organization|RALOs) to participate;
 +
* Conducted interviews, public meetings, and workshops at [[ICANN 65]] and [[ICANN 66]];
 +
* Received briefings from various groups, including ICANN org's Public Participation team and the [[Second NomCom Organizational Review|NomCom2]] implementation working group;
 +
* Reviewed the [[ICANN Accountability Indicators]] in detail;
 +
* Reviewed many ICANN documents; and
 +
* Requested and received numerous clarifications and details from ICANN org and staff<ref name="draftrep">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-report-atrt3-16dec19-en.pdf ATRT3 - Draft Report for Public Comment], December 16, 2019.</ref>
 +
 
 +
The sessions at ICANN Meetings generated many comments from The survey received 88 individual responses (with 50 of those responsed completing the majority of the survey) and responses from 14 of the 17 specifically invited ICANN groups.<ref name="draftrep" />
 +
 
 +
===Draft Report===
 +
The four work parties presented findings that were consolidated into a draft report, published for public comment on December 14, 2019.<ref name="draftrep" /> The draft report proposed substantial changes to ICANN's processes around specific and organizational reviews, prioritization of improvements, and public participation.
 +
 
 +
====Findings====
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The draft report received comments from many ICANN bodies, as well as the board.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-atrt3-draft-report-14feb20-en.pdf Staff Report on Public Comment Proceeding], February 14, 2020</ref> The review team analyzed and incorporated the comments into the final version of its report, which was delivered to the board in May 2020.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf ATRT3 - Final Report], May 29, 2020</ref>  
  
 
The final report generated substantial dissenting opinions in the public comment period.<ref name="comments">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-atrt3-final-report-31aug20-en.pdf Staff Report on Public Comment Proceeding], August 31, 2020</ref> In particular, the recommendations to suspend certain specific reviews until after the next cycle of the ATRT review was met with strong opposition from some constituencies.<ref name="comments" /> Following the public comment period, in November 2020, the ICANN Board approved a set of recommendations from the final report, "subject to prioritization."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-atrt3-final-recs-board-action-scorecard-30nov20-en.pdf ICANN Resolution Archive - ATRT3 Recommendations Scorecard]</ref><ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2020-11-30-en#1.a Resolution of the Board], November 30, 2020</ref>
 
The final report generated substantial dissenting opinions in the public comment period.<ref name="comments">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-atrt3-final-report-31aug20-en.pdf Staff Report on Public Comment Proceeding], August 31, 2020</ref> In particular, the recommendations to suspend certain specific reviews until after the next cycle of the ATRT review was met with strong opposition from some constituencies.<ref name="comments" /> Following the public comment period, in November 2020, the ICANN Board approved a set of recommendations from the final report, "subject to prioritization."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-atrt3-final-recs-board-action-scorecard-30nov20-en.pdf ICANN Resolution Archive - ATRT3 Recommendations Scorecard]</ref><ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2020-11-30-en#1.a Resolution of the Board], November 30, 2020</ref>

Revision as of 20:47, 7 July 2021

The Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) was initiated in January 2017.[1] As of May 2021, the review is in the plan implementation phase.[1]

Background

Purpose and Origin of Specific Reviews

The Affirmation of Commitments, an agreement between ICANN and the United States Department of Commerce, establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:

  • ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
  • preserves the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS;
  • promotes competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice; and
  • enables access to registration data.

It is also charged to periodically review and assess its performance through the lens of each of the above commitments.[2]

ICANN's board enshrined these commitments (and the associated reviews) in its Bylaws in Article 1 (Mission, Commitments, and Core Values)[3] and in Article 4 (Accountability and Review).[4] Article 4.6 deals with "Specific Reviews," each of which are tied to one of the commitments in the Affirmation of Commitments.[5]

The Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.[6] The ATRT is one such specific review.

Delays in Launching Substantive Work

The call for volunteers for ATRT3 was initially put out in January, 2017. It was subsequently extended in April 2017. At the time of extension, the Board noted that multiple factors were impacting the timing of ATRT3. Because of the timing of ATRT2, the ICANN Bylaws required that the review be launched not later than October 2017. Meanwhile, the Cross Community Working Group on ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) notified that Board in 2016 that its work was overlapping substantially with the scope of ATRT reviews. The CCWG-Accountability co-chairs raised the possibility of crafting a narrow scope for ATRT3, to avoid duplication of work.[7] At the same time, the IANA Transition was just wrapping up, and many voices within the ICANN community were speaking up about volunteer fatigue.[8] As a result, in 2018 the Board submitted three separate papers for public comment: "Short-Term options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews,"[9] "Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews,"[10] and a follow-up "Next Steps on Reviews" document.[11]

In October 2018, the board approved a resolution to instruct ATRT3 to begin work, encouraging them to promptly submit their work plan and begin substantive work in January 2019. It also appointed Maarten Botterman to the ATRT3 team.[8]

Review Team

The ATRT3 review team held its first in-person meeting in April 2019 to set the scope of the review and establish its work plan.[12] Unlike previous ATRT reviews, the review team did not identify a need for an independent expert to consult. Instead, they identified four top-level issues for the review team's work parties to address:

  1. Board governance and community interaction;
  2. GAC interaction with the board and the broader community;
  3. Review processes - how ICANN receives public input, as well as a review of implementation of recommendations from ATRT2;
  4. The impact of ICANN's decision-making process as it relates to the broader Internet community, and the effectiveness of ICANN's policy development process in fostering cross community participation.[12]

Methodology

The ATRT3 team utilized a number of fact-finding methods in order to gain a picture of the current state of ICANN's accountability and transparency initiatives:

  • Review and assessment of ATRT2 implementation;
  • Within each topic area, the work parties devised questions for a survey that was issued to the ICANN community, with specific invitations to ICANN structures (ACs, SOs, GNSO constituencies, and [[Regional At-Large Organization|RALOs) to participate;
  • Conducted interviews, public meetings, and workshops at ICANN 65 and ICANN 66;
  • Received briefings from various groups, including ICANN org's Public Participation team and the NomCom2 implementation working group;
  • Reviewed the ICANN Accountability Indicators in detail;
  • Reviewed many ICANN documents; and
  • Requested and received numerous clarifications and details from ICANN org and staff[13]

The sessions at ICANN Meetings generated many comments from The survey received 88 individual responses (with 50 of those responsed completing the majority of the survey) and responses from 14 of the 17 specifically invited ICANN groups.[13]

Draft Report

The four work parties presented findings that were consolidated into a draft report, published for public comment on December 14, 2019.[13] The draft report proposed substantial changes to ICANN's processes around specific and organizational reviews, prioritization of improvements, and public participation.

Findings

The draft report received comments from many ICANN bodies, as well as the board.[14] The review team analyzed and incorporated the comments into the final version of its report, which was delivered to the board in May 2020.[15]

The final report generated substantial dissenting opinions in the public comment period.[16] In particular, the recommendations to suspend certain specific reviews until after the next cycle of the ATRT review was met with strong opposition from some constituencies.[16] Following the public comment period, in November 2020, the ICANN Board approved a set of recommendations from the final report, "subject to prioritization."[17][18]

Implementation

ATRT3 is, as of July 2021, in the implementation phase.[1]

Impact on Organizational Reviews

In June 2021, the board agreed to defer GNSO3, in large part because of the recommendations of the ATRT3 final report. The board also effectively place a hold on all pending organizational reviews until such time as the ATRT3 recommendations were integrated into an implementation plan:

Resolved,...the Board determines that it is not feasible to initiate the GNSO3 Review at this time. The Board is deferring the initiation of the GNSO3 Review until such time as the Board, community and org better understand the impact of the ATRT3 Recommendations on the next Organizational Review cycle, as well as in consideration of the current community workload. Resolved,...the Board directs the ICANN President and CEO, or his designee, to develop a comprehensive plan for the timing and conduct of the next Organizational Review cycle, taking into consideration the timing of the implementation of the ATRT3 recommendations. This plan should be developed in consultation with the ICANN community, and ICANN org shall provide periodic updates to the Board on progress towards such plan.[19]

References