Difference between revisions of "New.net"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''New.net''' was an Alt-Root project that was relatively successful (enjoying partnerships with several mainstream Internet companies and many small startups) for just ov...")
 
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Rise and Fall of New.net==
 
==Rise and Fall of New.net==
−
===From 2000 to 2003: start-up energy==  
+
===From 2000 to 2003: start-up energy===
 
In 2000, Idealab announce that it was working on the new.net project, a browser plugin, in Pasadena, CA, to allow users to access its non-ICANN Top Level Domain names. The system relied on individual Internet service providers and a browser plug-in that Web surfers downloaded and installed. Addresses for the new domains went through the New.net site and were directed to locations that existed as subdomains of New.net. Adware via NewDotNet was bundled with games or Peer-to-peer file sharing programs. Adware offered monetary incentives for including it in software with payment per installation or ad-revenue sharing. Common hosts included Kazaa, iMesh, Limewire, and Gnutella. By the end of its run, New.net provided alternative (non-ICANN) TLDs in six languages.  
 
In 2000, Idealab announce that it was working on the new.net project, a browser plugin, in Pasadena, CA, to allow users to access its non-ICANN Top Level Domain names. The system relied on individual Internet service providers and a browser plug-in that Web surfers downloaded and installed. Addresses for the new domains went through the New.net site and were directed to locations that existed as subdomains of New.net. Adware via NewDotNet was bundled with games or Peer-to-peer file sharing programs. Adware offered monetary incentives for including it in software with payment per installation or ad-revenue sharing. Common hosts included Kazaa, iMesh, Limewire, and Gnutella. By the end of its run, New.net provided alternative (non-ICANN) TLDs in six languages.  
 
[https://web.archive.org/web/20051124194236/http://www.new.net/about_us_partners.tp Many partners in the early 2000s] and some early adopters were: Atlanta, Excite@Home Corp, NetZero, Earthlink, Wannado  <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>  <ref>https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotbots07/tech/full_papers/provos/provos.pdf The Ghost In The Browser: Analysis of Web-based Malware (Niels Provos, Dean McNamee, Panayiotis Mavrommatis, Ke Wang and Nagendra Modadugu, Google, Inc.)</ref> <ref>https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf Analysing Privacy-Invasive Software Using Computer Forensic Methods, Martin Boldt and Bengt Carlsson,  Information Security: 12th International Conference, Page 210</ref>
 
[https://web.archive.org/web/20051124194236/http://www.new.net/about_us_partners.tp Many partners in the early 2000s] and some early adopters were: Atlanta, Excite@Home Corp, NetZero, Earthlink, Wannado  <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>  <ref>https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotbots07/tech/full_papers/provos/provos.pdf The Ghost In The Browser: Analysis of Web-based Malware (Niels Provos, Dean McNamee, Panayiotis Mavrommatis, Ke Wang and Nagendra Modadugu, Google, Inc.)</ref> <ref>https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf Analysing Privacy-Invasive Software Using Computer Forensic Methods, Martin Boldt and Bengt Carlsson,  Information Security: 12th International Conference, Page 210</ref>
  
−
=== Relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003, even as ICANN downplayed new.net’s potential ===
+
=== Relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003===
 +
New.net enjoyed relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003 even as ICANN downplayed new.net’s potential.
 
* March 2001, Vint Cerf opines, "This idea ­-- it's a trick, really -- is something that other people have tried before, and it didn't ignite into any large business outcome," <ref>https://www.wired.com/2001/03/icann-tld-threat-what-threat/</ref>
 
* March 2001, Vint Cerf opines, "This idea ­-- it's a trick, really -- is something that other people have tried before, and it didn't ignite into any large business outcome," <ref>https://www.wired.com/2001/03/icann-tld-threat-what-threat/</ref>
 
March 5, 2001: from the ''Wall Street Journal'' the article, “Start-Up Will Sell Web Addresses To Bypass Internet Bureaucracy”, by Don Clark, stated, “Investor Bill Gross is planning one of the most ambitious attempts to bypass the bureaucracy that assigns Internet names.” <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>  
 
March 5, 2001: from the ''Wall Street Journal'' the article, “Start-Up Will Sell Web Addresses To Bypass Internet Bureaucracy”, by Don Clark, stated, “Investor Bill Gross is planning one of the most ambitious attempts to bypass the bureaucracy that assigns Internet names.” <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>  
Line 30: Line 31:
 
* December 1, 2003, the last piece of (good) press was posted to New.net's "In the News" page: from Domain Name Journal, the article "New.net's Impossible Dream: Can The Alternate TLD Company Reach the Unreachable Star?" by Ron Jackson <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20070629085624/http://www.new.net/news_release_0313.tp</ref>  
 
* December 1, 2003, the last piece of (good) press was posted to New.net's "In the News" page: from Domain Name Journal, the article "New.net's Impossible Dream: Can The Alternate TLD Company Reach the Unreachable Star?" by Ron Jackson <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20070629085624/http://www.new.net/news_release_0313.tp</ref>  
  
−
=== Fall 2003: the beginning of troubles in the courts of justice and of public opinion, as it becomes clear that new.net’s business plan depended on erroneous traffic ===
+
=== Fall 2003: the beginning of troubles in the courts of justice and of public opinion===
 +
New.net began experiencing cracks in its plan due to troubles in the courts of justice and of public opinion, as it depended on erroneous and unintentional traffic.
 
====Overview====
 
====Overview====
 
# New.net surreptitiously bundled  NewDotNet with software  
 
# New.net surreptitiously bundled  NewDotNet with software  

Revision as of 20:23, 27 July 2022

New.net was an Alt-Root project that was relatively successful (enjoying partnerships with several mainstream Internet companies and many small startups) for just over eight years. Ultimately, legal and public opinion troubles spelled the company's demise. The startup was based in Pasadena, California, out of Idealab, which was initially funded by Bill Gross.

Project’s Business Plan

  1. Tried to convince all Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that they should support New.net domains (in exchange for financial considerations) and lined up distributors of popular software programs to include a New.net plug-in to make new.net domains visible on the enabled computers.
  2. The Quick! search service was the primary reason the company operated in the black. When New.net-enabled users mistyped any web address (New.net or otherwise) in their browser they landed on a Quick! Page with an array of Pay Per Click advertiser links. When visitors clicked on those links, advertisers paid New.net. Dave Hernand compared it to Verisign's suspended Sitefinder service, which profited from .com and .net address errors before ICANN pressured it to shut down.
  3. New.net regularly attended ICANN Meetings to advance their agenda and foster business relationships with the ICANN Community.
  4. first-come, first-served basis of selling TLDs at $25 (in 2001) [1]
  5. Compete by providing an easier user experience. Other companies already selling domain names outside the Icann structure required users to change settings on their Web-browser programs. New.net relied on persuading Internet service providers to use software that automatically routed users to the new Web addresses.[2]

Leadership

New.net Presidents & CEOs: In 2002, Dan Sheehy replaced Dave Hernand, who rejoined Latham & Watkins[3] CTO: Steve Hotz[4] chief marketing officer: Steve Chadima Initial funder: Bill Gross backend: UltraDNS Corp Parent Company: idealab

Rise and Fall of New.net

From 2000 to 2003: start-up energy

In 2000, Idealab announce that it was working on the new.net project, a browser plugin, in Pasadena, CA, to allow users to access its non-ICANN Top Level Domain names. The system relied on individual Internet service providers and a browser plug-in that Web surfers downloaded and installed. Addresses for the new domains went through the New.net site and were directed to locations that existed as subdomains of New.net. Adware via NewDotNet was bundled with games or Peer-to-peer file sharing programs. Adware offered monetary incentives for including it in software with payment per installation or ad-revenue sharing. Common hosts included Kazaa, iMesh, Limewire, and Gnutella. By the end of its run, New.net provided alternative (non-ICANN) TLDs in six languages. Many partners in the early 2000s and some early adopters were: Atlanta, Excite@Home Corp, NetZero, Earthlink, Wannado [5] [6] [7]

Relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003

New.net enjoyed relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003 even as ICANN downplayed new.net’s potential.

  • March 2001, Vint Cerf opines, "This idea ­-- it's a trick, really -- is something that other people have tried before, and it didn't ignite into any large business outcome," [8]

March 5, 2001: from the Wall Street Journal the article, “Start-Up Will Sell Web Addresses To Bypass Internet Bureaucracy”, by Don Clark, stated, “Investor Bill Gross is planning one of the most ambitious attempts to bypass the bureaucracy that assigns Internet names.” [9]

  • May 28, 2001, ICANN does a PSA on why there needs to be a unique root[10]
  • On May 31, 2001, New.net sends a proposal to ICANN suggesting it adopt a hybrid Market/Consensus Approach to allow more competition, comparing it to browser competition [11]
  • Following June 26, 2001 .biz deal, domainers became disenchanted with ICANN and began considering whether IOD and new.net would give more people a chance ($25, first-come-first-served) [12]
  • In November 2001, 41% of the netizens participating in an (unofficial) ICANN Watch feel new.net presents the greatest threat to the security of the DNS, followed by Verisign, which received 23% of the votes. [13]
  • In 2002, New.net enjoyed steady growth in fundraising and partnerships[14][15]
  • December 1, 2003, the last piece of (good) press was posted to New.net's "In the News" page: from Domain Name Journal, the article "New.net's Impossible Dream: Can The Alternate TLD Company Reach the Unreachable Star?" by Ron Jackson [16]

Fall 2003: the beginning of troubles in the courts of justice and of public opinion

New.net began experiencing cracks in its plan due to troubles in the courts of justice and of public opinion, as it depended on erroneous and unintentional traffic.

Overview

  1. New.net surreptitiously bundled NewDotNet with software
  2. Sued for an injunction against Lavasoft for notifying users and helping them remove NewDotNet
  3. New.net lost the suit
  4. Became the bad guy in a titillating news story with national coverage that scares the nation that it could happen to them

On 6 May 2003, New.net filed a federal lawsuit in the Central District Court of California against Lavasoft claiming it engaged in false advertising, unfair competition, trade libel, and tortious interference

Details

  • November 4, 2003: The court stated: New.net brings this suit to protect its ability to surreptitiously download its New.net software by silencing a company whose computer program, at the request of the computer owner, calls attention to NewDotNet's presence on the user's hard drive.
  • May 20, 2004, New.net’s software, NewDotNet, was downloaded onto individual computers often without the owners’ knowledge or request. Sheehy conceded that New.net’s success depended “on its ability to distribute as many copies of the New.net Software as possible.” New.net realized this objective by surreptitiously bundling NewDotNet with other popular software programs. Lavasoft’s Ad-aware was purposefully downloaded to detect and remove programs like Newdotnet. New.net complained that the injuries caused by Ad-aware’s inclusion of NewDotNet in its database are actionable under both state and federal law. The Court denied New.net’s motion for a preliminary injunction to halt Lavasoft from including NewDotNet in its database as Lavasoft was engaging in First Amendment protected speech. Then Lavasoft moved to dismiss the claims in their entirety under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, which provides an expedited procedure for dismissing lawsuits designed to stifle speech on issues of public importance. The Court granted the motion, dismissing the claim with prejudice. [17]
  • October 19, 2004, Julie Amero was substituting for a seventh-grade language class at Kelly Middle School in Norwich, Connecticut. After stepping out of the hallway for a moment, she found two students browsing a hairstyling site. The computer browser began continuously opening pop-ups with pornographic content.
  • January 5, 2007, Amero was convicted in Norwich Superior Court on four counts of risk of injury to a minor or impairing the morals of a child. These felony charges carry a maximum prison sentence of 40 years.
  • March 21, 2007, Sunbelt Software led the team of computer investigators in analyzing the school computer and concluded that Amero was innocent. They showed that on October 14, 2004, the adware program, NewDotNet, was installed on Julie Amero’s computer. The program suite “Free Offers from Freeze.com” was installed at the same time. NewDotNet was installed surreptitiously when Julie installed a Halloween screen saver. [18]
  • June 6, 2007, a New London superior court judge Hillary Strackbein, set aside that jury verdict, granting Amero a new trial. [19]
  • November 21, 2008, Julie Amero pleaded guilty to a single charge of disorderly conduct before Superior Court Judge Robert E. Young in Norwich., paying a US$100 charge and forfeiting her teaching credentials.

Outcomes

  • In the overturning of State v. Amero, New.net was revealed as the "real villain" as its software, NewDotNet, was irrevocably cast as spyware, malware, adware, and the destroyer of lives with its pop-up porn ads [20]
  • The case becomes fodder for forensic legal-techno analyses, law textbooks, and the basis for developing and mainstreaming digital forensics (e.g. [21][22] [23]

August 2008 to January 2012

  • Until August 15, 2008, the key partners and a link to the full list of partners are included on the main page.

From August 15 to August 28, 2008, the site is down for maintenance

  • On August 28, 2008, the site has a new look and there is no mention of partners, a list of partners, or a press room anywhere on the site. The site now offers “Domain Decoder” plugin for Domain Decoder plug-in for Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox and boasts that it has been “selling New.net top-level domain names for over 8 years to over 25,000 customers worldwide.” None of the links/tabs on the main page resolved until July 10, 2011
  • from July 10, 2011, to May 12, 2012, New.net sits unchanged until the Internet Archive’s last capture of new.net’s main page.
  • March 29, 2012, ICANN closes the New gTLD Application period
  • June 13, 2012, ICANN hosts the New gTLD Reveal Day

References

  1. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp
  2. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp
  3. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20021012122527/http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=156973&TICK=NEWN&STORY=/www/story/06-17-2002/0001748590&EDATE=Jun+17,+2002
  4. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20021014122139/http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=156973&TICK=NEWN&STORY=/www/story/04-02-2002/0001697732&EDATE=Apr+2,+2002
  5. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp
  6. ↑ https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotbots07/tech/full_papers/provos/provos.pdf The Ghost In The Browser: Analysis of Web-based Malware (Niels Provos, Dean McNamee, Panayiotis Mavrommatis, Ke Wang and Nagendra Modadugu, Google, Inc.)
  7. ↑ https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf Analysing Privacy-Invasive Software Using Computer Forensic Methods, Martin Boldt and Bengt Carlsson, Information Security: 12th International Conference, Page 210
  8. ↑ https://www.wired.com/2001/03/icann-tld-threat-what-threat/
  9. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp
  10. ↑ https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm, https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/schecter-letter-to-icann-2001-07-16-en
  11. ↑ https://archive.icann.org/en/icp/icp-3-background/new.net-paper-31may01.pdf
  12. ↑ https://forum.icann.org/uniqueroot/3B1AE41E00000069.html
  13. ↑ http://www.icannwatch.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=10&aid=-1
  14. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20040607221431/http://www.new.net/about_us_news_archive2002.tp
  15. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20021014124347/http://www.new.net/about_us_partners.tp
  16. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20070629085624/http://www.new.net/news_release_0313.tp
  17. ↑ https://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/caselaw/slapp-cases-decided-by-u-s-district-courts/new-net-inc-v-lavasoft/
  18. ↑ http://sunbeltblog.eckelberry.com/wp-content/ihs/alex/julieamerosummary.pdf Technical review of the Trial Testimony State of Connecticut vs. Julie Amero, Alex Eckelberry Glenn Dardick, Ph.D., Joel A. Folkerts, Alex Shipp, Eric Sites, Joe Stewart, Robin Stuart
  19. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20090116040313/http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9121218&intsrc=news_ts_head
  20. ↑ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=%22newdotnet%22&btnG=
  21. ↑ https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icpel-16/25855137 Legal Regulation of the Advertising Blocking Feature-A Chinese Perspective
  22. ↑ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6173003?casa_token=Kxf5BxcXt0YAAAAA:oxQJy_4Wwep4HhFKiAcBuuZAvvGs3IPMypoTFir49cnIaez3OlXaD6LQ1OFG12Mmvv7gufCz4gcJ
  23. ↑ https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=jdfsl
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=New.net&oldid=1344465"