Line 147: |
Line 147: |
| * In the [[GAC]] session called 'GAC Discussion: WHOIS and Data Protection,' [[Laureen Kapin]] led a discussion on the need for validated "operational" accuracy, as opposed to merely syntactical accuracy, in terms of registrants' contact information, as GAC members often represent law enforcement and regulatory bodies. | | * In the [[GAC]] session called 'GAC Discussion: WHOIS and Data Protection,' [[Laureen Kapin]] led a discussion on the need for validated "operational" accuracy, as opposed to merely syntactical accuracy, in terms of registrants' contact information, as GAC members often represent law enforcement and regulatory bodies. |
| | | |
− | ===GNSO PDPs=== | + | ===[[GNSO]] [[PDP]]s=== |
| ====Transfer Policy==== | | ====Transfer Policy==== |
| * The [[Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy|GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group]] focused on enhancing security without limiting options for verification | | * The [[Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy|GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group]] focused on enhancing security without limiting options for verification |
Line 153: |
Line 153: |
| # A domain name can experience a discontinuity of DNS resolution and [[DNSSEC]] validation if the transfer of [[:Category:DNS Services|DNS Services]] is not considered during the process. | | # A domain name can experience a discontinuity of DNS resolution and [[DNSSEC]] validation if the transfer of [[:Category:DNS Services|DNS Services]] is not considered during the process. |
| # A domain name is more at risk of being [[Domain Name Hijacking|hijacked]] if the authInfo code is not managed based on best practice security principles. | | # A domain name is more at risk of being [[Domain Name Hijacking|hijacked]] if the authInfo code is not managed based on best practice security principles. |
− | ====RPM Phase 2==== | + | ====[[Rights Protection Mechanisms]] Review Phase 2==== |
| * The [[IPC]] held a discussion on scoping concerns for the [[UDRP]] Review (by [[Susan Payne]]), based on a list of suggestions sent by [[John McElwaine]] to [[GDD]], including reducing the negativity toward the UDRP to reflect the reality of the majority report (that it has been a relative success); making it data-driven (from [[WIPO]], providers, trends for analysis, [[INTA]]); and not starting from scratch. The [[BC]] supports the IPC's concerns. Their suggestions included: | | * The [[IPC]] held a discussion on scoping concerns for the [[UDRP]] Review (by [[Susan Payne]]), based on a list of suggestions sent by [[John McElwaine]] to [[GDD]], including reducing the negativity toward the UDRP to reflect the reality of the majority report (that it has been a relative success); making it data-driven (from [[WIPO]], providers, trends for analysis, [[INTA]]); and not starting from scratch. The [[BC]] supports the IPC's concerns. Their suggestions included: |
| ** Use [[Consensus Playbook]]; and that | | ** Use [[Consensus Playbook]]; and that |