Changes

Line 147: Line 147:  
* In the [[GAC]] session called 'GAC Discussion: WHOIS and Data Protection,' [[Laureen Kapin]] led a discussion on the need for validated "operational" accuracy, as opposed to merely syntactical accuracy, in terms of registrants' contact information, as GAC members often represent law enforcement and regulatory bodies.
 
* In the [[GAC]] session called 'GAC Discussion: WHOIS and Data Protection,' [[Laureen Kapin]] led a discussion on the need for validated "operational" accuracy, as opposed to merely syntactical accuracy, in terms of registrants' contact information, as GAC members often represent law enforcement and regulatory bodies.
   −
===GNSO PDPs===
+
===[[GNSO]] [[PDP]]s===
 
====Transfer Policy====
 
====Transfer Policy====
 
* The [[Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy|GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group]] focused on enhancing security without limiting options for verification
 
* The [[Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy|GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group]] focused on enhancing security without limiting options for verification
Line 153: Line 153:  
# A domain name can experience a discontinuity of DNS resolution and [[DNSSEC]] validation if the transfer of [[:Category:DNS Services|DNS Services]] is not considered during the process.
 
# A domain name can experience a discontinuity of DNS resolution and [[DNSSEC]] validation if the transfer of [[:Category:DNS Services|DNS Services]] is not considered during the process.
 
# A domain name is more at risk of being [[Domain Name Hijacking|hijacked]] if the authInfo code is not managed based on best practice security principles.
 
# A domain name is more at risk of being [[Domain Name Hijacking|hijacked]] if the authInfo code is not managed based on best practice security principles.
====RPM Phase 2====
+
====[[Rights Protection Mechanisms]] Review Phase 2====
 
* The [[IPC]] held a discussion on scoping concerns for the [[UDRP]] Review (by [[Susan Payne]]), based on a list of suggestions sent by [[John McElwaine]] to [[GDD]], including reducing the negativity toward the UDRP to reflect the reality of the majority report (that it has been a relative success); making it data-driven (from [[WIPO]], providers, trends for analysis, [[INTA]]); and not starting from scratch. The [[BC]] supports the IPC's concerns. Their suggestions included:  
 
* The [[IPC]] held a discussion on scoping concerns for the [[UDRP]] Review (by [[Susan Payne]]), based on a list of suggestions sent by [[John McElwaine]] to [[GDD]], including reducing the negativity toward the UDRP to reflect the reality of the majority report (that it has been a relative success); making it data-driven (from [[WIPO]], providers, trends for analysis, [[INTA]]); and not starting from scratch. The [[BC]] supports the IPC's concerns. Their suggestions included:  
 
** Use [[Consensus Playbook]]; and that
 
** Use [[Consensus Playbook]]; and that
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,932

edits