Search results

...s/registries/unsponsored/registry-agmt-26feb01-en.htm Proposed Unsponsored TLD Agreement, 26 February 2001]</ref>

...s/registries/unsponsored/registry-agmt-26feb01-en.htm Proposed Unsponsored TLD Agreement, 26 February 2001]</ref>

...s/registries/unsponsored/registry-agmt-26feb01-en.htm Proposed Unsponsored TLD Agreement, 26 February ]</ref>

...st notably by [[Amazon]] and [[Google]] propose restricting the use of the TLD to solely corporate purposes * [[Community gTLD|Community TLD]] - the proposed new gTLDs under this application are restricted to a specific community wi

...s/registries/unsponsored/registry-agmt-26feb01-en.htm Proposed Unsponsored TLD Agreement, 26 February ]</ref>

...ews Agency Guangdong Branch]] manages the TLD and is its [[Registry]]. The proposed application succeeded and was delegated to the [[Root Zone]] on 24 August,

...r companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<re

...www.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#I Introduction of New TLD]</ref> Seven new TLDs were implemented between 2001 to 2002.Four new unspon

...]. [[.CLUB Domains LLC]] is the [[Registry]] and manager of the TLD. Their proposed application succeeded and was delegated to the [[Root Zone]] on 18 January

...defining operating procedures when moving from the long form essays in the TLD application to the Registry Agreement.

...r the TLD. Prior to reaching [[General Availabilty]] on July 15, 2015, the TLD logged over 1,000 registrations during its trademark sunrise period.

...t defined in its applications. The PIC submission process and proposed New TLD Registry Accreditation Agreement controversially include provisions giving

* Any of the proposed changes has an effect to the growth of the root zone. The study team sugges ...in the number of TLDs will not increase the number of request per year per TLD.

...will have the opportunity to review and raise their concerns regarding the proposed new gTLD strings. Pritz also enumerated the four available objection proces # '''String Confusion Objection'''- the proposed new gTLD is confusingly similar to an existing or to another applied for gT

...will have the opportunity to review and raise their concerns regarding the proposed new gTLD strings. Pritz also enumerated the four available objection proces # '''String Confusion Objection'''- the proposed new gTLD is confusingly similar to an existing or to another applied for gT

...will have the opportunity to review and raise their concerns regarding the proposed new gTLD strings. Pritz also enumerated the four available objection proces # '''String Confusion Objection'''- the proposed new gTLD is confusingly similar to an existing or to another applied for gT