239
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + + + + + +
→Historical Significance
==Historical Significance==
==Historical Significance==
There were many key issues raised throughout the duration of the sessions which had taken place at [[ICANN]] 12. It was a very signifivant event on the history of ICANN. There were key points which were raised in reagrds to the indepandant review policy, as it had become recognised tht the current ploicy had not been able to serve the purpose in which it had been designed to do.
The policy was set up to provide persons with an independant review of all current and previous [[ICANN]] board desicions or actions. however it had been noted that the Board acted or failed to act in a manner contrary to the ICANN's Articles of Incorporation or bylaws. The system had as a result of this discusison been changed to lead a new structure which was to consist of a review panal.
The memers of the review panal now had to have asufficent knowldge of all internet matters and the problems in which some person may come across. The panalist was also now to be current judges or were a judge in a previous occupation. <ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/accra/indrev-topic.htm]</ref>
Diring this meeting there was also a session which had discussed the current structure of [[ICANN]]. A reform was announced as it was believed that this would enable ICANN to produce the results they need and also to allow [[ICANN]] to become more effective in fulfilling there mission.
==Refereances==
==Refereances==