Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
7 bytes added ,  12 years ago
Line 19: Line 19:  
[http://domainincite.com/breaking-icann-extends-new-gtld-application-window-after-technical-glitch/ Breaking: ICANN extends new gTLD application window after technical glitch]</ref>
 
[http://domainincite.com/breaking-icann-extends-new-gtld-application-window-after-technical-glitch/ Breaking: ICANN extends new gTLD application window after technical glitch]</ref>
   −
Apart from the extension of the application window, ICANN also informed journalists that the problem was not caused by a cyber attack, no application data were lost and the TAS system is expected to open on April 18. According to [[.Nxt|.nxt]] analysis, the situation maybe considered as a ''"[[non-denia-denial]] category and ICANN was following the second path dealing with a suspected hack."'' <ref>[http://a.sw.io/4lpYmPg Was ICANN's new gTLDs system hacked?]</ref> <ref>
+
Apart from the extension of the application window, ICANN also informed journalists that the problem was not caused by a cyber attack, no application data were lost and the TAS system is expected to open on April 18. According to [[.Nxt|.nxt]] speculated that the situation maybe considered as a ''"[[non-denial-denial]] category and ICANN was following the second path dealing with a suspected hack."'' <ref>[http://a.sw.io/4lpYmPg Was ICANN's new gTLDs system hacked?]</ref> <ref>
 
[http://domainincite.com/tas-glitch-not-an-attack-says-icann/ TAS glitch “not an attack” says ICANN]</ref>
 
[http://domainincite.com/tas-glitch-not-an-attack-says-icann/ TAS glitch “not an attack” says ICANN]</ref>
  
9,082

edits

Navigation menu