Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 76: Line 76:     
==Freedom of Information Act==
 
==Freedom of Information Act==
In September, 2012, Nominet was accused of previously taking measures to evade the U.K.'s Freedom of Information Act. The apparent acts took place in 2008, when an employee of Nominet intentionally used personal email accounts, and recommended deleting old emails, to avoid having to submit to any public communication inquiries made possible by the FOIA. The correspondence in question seems to be related to restructuring efforts to the governance of [[.uk]], which was sought after by a section of the general public. If the correspondence is real it may go on to show that the government coordinated with Nominet to restructure the company and its governance in a more mutually beneficial and inscrutable way.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10414-whistleblower-accuses-nominet-of-trying-to-dodge-freedom-of-information-law Whistleblower Accuses Nominet of Trying to Dodge Freedom of Information Law, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
+
In September, 2012, Nominet was accused of previously taking measures to evade the U.K.'s Freedom of Information Act. The apparent acts took place in 2008, when an employee of Nominet intentionally used personal email accounts, and recommended deleting old emails, to avoid having to submit to any public communication inquiries made possible by the FOIA. The correspondence in question seems to be related to restructuring efforts to the governance of [[.uk]], which was sought after by a section of the general public. If the correspondence is real it may go on to show that the government coordinated with Nominet to restructure the company and its governance in a more mutually beneficial manner.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10414-whistleblower-accuses-nominet-of-trying-to-dodge-freedom-of-information-law Whistleblower Accuses Nominet of Trying to Dodge Freedom of Information Law, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
    
== References ==
 
== References ==

Navigation menu