90
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 200:
Line 200: + +
→ICANN Analysis of Community TLD Concept
Some comments state that community-based governance mechanisms should be part of the criteria. To add points for a multi‐stakeholder governance structure in general, or regarding policy development in particular, certainly has some merit but would add considerable complexity to the assessment and require additional compliance measures post‐delegation. '''The community priority evaluation is not intended to be a means of requiring various types of community representation models.''' However, it is expected that an accountability to the community is present, as demonstrated by the other criteria (e.g., delineation of the community, registration policies, and documentation of support).
Some comments state that community-based governance mechanisms should be part of the criteria. To add points for a multi‐stakeholder governance structure in general, or regarding policy development in particular, certainly has some merit but would add considerable complexity to the assessment and require additional compliance measures post‐delegation. '''The community priority evaluation is not intended to be a means of requiring various types of community representation models.''' However, it is expected that an accountability to the community is present, as demonstrated by the other criteria (e.g., delineation of the community, registration policies, and documentation of support).
----
----
'''Applicant Guidebook V6 ICANN Comment Analysis:'''
'''Applicant Guidebook V6 ICANN Comment Analysis:'''