6,681
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + +
→Outcomes
==Outcomes==
==Outcomes==
Official statements by several Internet Organizations such as [[ICANN]] and [[APNIC]] praised the meeting's outcomes and document as a roadmap for future discussions on Internet Governance. Others thought there was room for improvement but that the outcome was positive especially given the short timeframe. A few civil society groups and government representatives from Russia, Cuba, and India disagreed with either the proposed model or principles, with the government representatives calling for a U.N.-controlled model of Internet Governance.<ref>[
Following NETmundial, the leaders of organizations relating to Internet infrastructure (called [[I* Leaders]]) met in Brazil and expressed their support for the outcomes of NETmundial, stating that the meeting "has energized the multistakeholder discussions and model in a positive fashion."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-05-13-en Post-NETmundial Statement by I* Leaders, ICANN.org] Retrieved 28 May 2014</ref>
Following NETmundial, the leaders of organizations relating to Internet infrastructure (called [[I* Leaders]]) met in Brazil and expressed their support for the outcomes of NETmundial, stating that the meeting "has energized the multistakeholder discussions and model in a positive fashion."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-05-13-en Post-NETmundial Statement by I* Leaders, ICANN.org] Retrieved 28 May 2014</ref>