Changes

no edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:  
# Institute rules and procedures for arbitral review of UDRP decisions in cases involving IGO Complainants.
 
# Institute rules and procedures for arbitral review of UDRP decisions in cases involving IGO Complainants.
 
# Institute rules and procedures for arbitral review of URS decisions in cases involving IGO Complainants.
 
# Institute rules and procedures for arbitral review of URS decisions in cases involving IGO Complainants.
# Choice of law to be mutually agreed upon or, in the absence of agreement, may be either the registrar or registrant's principal address as listed in the relevant WHOIS database; as a last resort, arbitration panel may determine what law to apply.<ref name="finalrep" />  
+
# Choice of law to be mutually agreed upon or, in the absence of agreement, may be either the registrar or registrant's principal address as listed in the relevant WHOIS database; as a last resort, an arbitration panel may determine what law to apply.<ref name="finalrep" />  
    
The recommendations were designed to address the "review gap" in UDRP and URS procedures that initiated the EPDP in the manner prescribed by the charter document.<ref name="finalrep" /> The team noted the concerns expressed during the public comment period:
 
The recommendations were designed to address the "review gap" in UDRP and URS procedures that initiated the EPDP in the manner prescribed by the charter document.<ref name="finalrep" /> The team noted the concerns expressed during the public comment period:
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,932

edits