Difference between revisions of ".doctor"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
# [[Radix]] (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen [[ARI Registry Services]] as its backend technical provider.<ref>[http://www.radixregistry.com/tlds/social-healthcare.php Social Healthcare, RadixRegistry.com]</ref>
 
# [[Radix]] (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen [[ARI Registry Services]] as its backend technical provider.<ref>[http://www.radixregistry.com/tlds/social-healthcare.php Social Healthcare, RadixRegistry.com]</ref>
 
# [[Donuts]] (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. [[Daniel Schindler]], co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. <ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/donuts-inc-eye-popping-list-of-307-new-top-level-domains/11730 Donuts Inc eye popping list of 307 new top-level domains]</ref>
 
# [[Donuts]] (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. [[Daniel Schindler]], co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. <ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/donuts-inc-eye-popping-list-of-307-new-top-level-domains/11730 Donuts Inc eye popping list of 307 new top-level domains]</ref>
# [[The Medical Registry Limited]] -he contact person in the application is Mr. [[Sloan Daniel Gaon]].
+
# [[The Medical Registry Limited]] -the contact person in the application is Mr. [[Sloan Daniel Gaon]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Donuts===
 +
The application for [[.doctor]] from Donuts was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 24 Nov 2012</ref> The warning notes that the TLD refers to a regulated market though Donuts did not include sufficient mechanisms to prevent consumer harm in its application.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Doctor-AU-52453.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353387521000 Doctor AU, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref> None of the other two applicants received a GAC Early Warning.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 02:28, 25 November 2012

Status: Proposed
Type: Generic
Category: Health

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.doctor is a proposed new TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants

  1. Radix (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen ARI Registry Services as its backend technical provider.[1]
  2. Donuts (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. Daniel Schindler, co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. [2]
  3. The Medical Registry Limited -the contact person in the application is Mr. Sloan Daniel Gaon.


Donuts

The application for .doctor from Donuts was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[3] The warning notes that the TLD refers to a regulated market though Donuts did not include sufficient mechanisms to prevent consumer harm in its application.[4] None of the other two applicants received a GAC Early Warning.

References