Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...ds-machines-18nov14-en.pdf ICANN Board Governance Committee Determination, Reconsideration Request 14-46], November 18, 2014</ref> As a result, the contention set was
    6 KB (813 words) - 05:15, 6 April 2024
  • The ACM Internet Governance Committee (ACM-IGF) has been active in sharing its views, comments and recommendation ...g/en/comments-mail/comment-udrp/current/msg00001.html ACM-IGC Petition for Reconsideration on Cybersquatting]</ref>
    6 KB (879 words) - 02:09, 4 May 2024
  • ...Botterman, ICANN Blogs]</ref> The first one focused on the Board Technical Committee (BTC), which oversees the technical work necessary to [[ICANN Mission- and * The [[ICANN Bylaws|Fundamental Bylaws]] were amended to redesignate [[Reconsideration]] responsibilities from the BGC to the BAMC
    23 KB (2,782 words) - 21:29, 29 March 2024
  • ...e-05feb14-en.pdf 12. Determination of the Board Governance Committee (BGC) Reconsideration Request 13–23]</ref> . Nevertheless, on 3 February 2016 the ICANN Board
    13 KB (1,828 words) - 17:12, 16 February 2016
  • ...iberations, the ICANN Board accepted the draft principles and the Advisory Committee was instructed to complete its task. On August 6, 1999, the Advisory Committee submitted the Final Report: Principles for Independent Review. The ICANN Bo
    31 KB (4,693 words) - 17:44, 2 February 2023
  • ...
 hope for 
benefits
 of .xxx." On December 15, 2000, ICM Registry filed a Reconsideration Request with ICANN but no action was rendered. The [[ICANN Board]] cited th ...he global interoperability and stability of the internet. Furthermore, the Committee also pointed out the possibility that ICANN may have to assume a management
    20 KB (2,873 words) - 17:11, 7 June 2022
  • * reform of the [[Nominating Committee]]. ...tablished rules for At-Large director seats on the board); and an Advisory Committee on Independent Review (until such time as the board adopted procedures for
    39 KB (5,704 words) - 04:56, 6 April 2024
  • ...have the decision re-evaluated, except for broader appeal such as ICANN's Reconsideration Request and possibly other legal measures such as a lawsuit.<ref>[http://do ...domains across different countries in ICANN's [[GAC|Governmental Advisory Committee]] (GAC).The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of
    12 KB (1,642 words) - 18:51, 9 January 2017
  • * [[IDN Committee]] is established, 2001.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-10sep0 * Creation of [[Executive Search Committee]], 2002.<ref name="bucharest"></ref>
    45 KB (6,567 words) - 18:46, 13 June 2023
  • ...ountability Mechanisms Committee Determination re: Urgent Consideration of Reconsideration Request 21-3], December 16, 2021</ref> Industry news outlets noted that the
    17 KB (2,299 words) - 17:08, 14 January 2022
  • ...9935072000 13 November 2010- Letter to At-Large Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC)]</ref> ...e]. Published 2013 May 22. Retrieved 2013 May 22.</ref> . New gTLD Program Committee and subsequently gave recommendation that the GAC advice be followed. Howev
    60 KB (8,447 words) - 15:29, 21 March 2022
  • * Improvements to the reconsideration process; ...via stress testing (specifically, require the Board to respond to Advisory Committee advice, and to consult with the GAC and find mutually acceptable solutions
    43 KB (6,430 words) - 14:52, 5 August 2022
  • ::*[[Vint Cerf]], Chairman of ICANN before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet ...ed in the creation of Article 4, along with the establishment of ICANN's [[Reconsideration]] mechanism, the [[Independent Review Panel]], and the office of the [[ICAN
    22 KB (3,077 words) - 17:39, 20 January 2023
  • * [[BGC]] – a committee established to enhance the performance of the Board, lead the annual Board * [[CEO Search Committee]] – the committee formed following Rod Beckstrom's August 2011 announcement that he would not
    45 KB (6,220 words) - 18:33, 29 March 2022
  • ...the denial. If requestors want to appeal their decision, they can file a [[Reconsideration]] request. ICANN posts all requests and responses on its [https://www.icann ...G stated that the Ombuds would likely have to recuse themselves from any [[Reconsideration]] request challenging a DIDP response they had reviewed and the [[Complaint
    121 KB (17,080 words) - 18:36, 27 January 2023
  • * 2006, March - In the Wellington Communiqué by ICANN's [[GAC]], the committee came out against the proposed .xxx. Also at that time, the ICANN Board vote ...tion for .xxx met the required sponsorship criteria, and that "the Board’s reconsideration of that finding was not consistent with the application of neutral, objecti
    47 KB (6,957 words) - 16:38, 15 March 2021
  • ...and email exchanges. DCA wrote to the At Large Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC), on November 14, 2010 <ref>[http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs053 ...C Objection advice which they submitted a response to the New gTLD Program Committee which subsequently gave recommendation that the GAC advice be followed. How
    49 KB (6,948 words) - 21:03, 30 April 2024
  • ...rocess (PDP). With community input, including the “[[Governmental Advisory Committee|GAC]] Principles Regarding New gTLDs,<ref>[https://gac.icann.org/contentMig ...Concurrent with the [public] comment period, ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) may issue a GAC Early Warning notice concerning an application. This
    54 KB (7,908 words) - 18:12, 17 May 2023

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)